SYSTEM ACTIVE47,291 DECISIONS PROCESSED<50MS AVG LATENCYEU AI ACT: 156 DAYSwithaegis.ai
THE CASE FOR NOW

Three forces. One window. 12–18 months.

FORCE 01

AI adoption has outpaced governance.

50–200+
AI MODELS IN PRODUCTION PER MAJOR BANK

Major banks are running AI across credit decisioning, fraud detection, AML monitoring, KYC, and customer service. Model deployment timelines are measured in weeks. Governance frameworks are measured in quarters. The gap widens every sprint.

FORCE 02

Regulators are acting now.

OSFI B-15 (2024)

Canada's AI guidance for federally regulated financial institutions. Explicit requirements for AI risk management, model inventory, and governance documentation.

EU AI Act (2025–2026)

High-risk AI systems in financial services face an August 2026 enforcement deadline. Non-compliance fines: up to €35M or 7% of global annual turnover.

OCC (Active)

AI examination frameworks being finalized. Examiners are already asking for AI inventories in routine examinations.

SR 11-7 (2011)

The Federal Reserve's model risk guidance was written for statistical models. It does not address LLMs, foundation models, or agentic AI. Banks are expected to extrapolate — under examination conditions.

FORCE 03

Legacy tools weren't built for this.

GRC PLATFORMS (SERVICENOW, ARCHER, METRICSTREAM)

Track policies and controls. Do not track models, governance decisions, or AI-specific events.

AI OBSERVABILITY TOOLS (ARIZE, WHYLABS)

Monitor model performance. Do not generate audit trails or policy attestations.

Result: banks are governing AI with GRC workflows, spreadsheets, and manual documentation. None of which satisfies an examiner asking for a governed system of record.

The institutions that build governance infrastructure before the examination will have a structural advantage.

Request Access